Rick Altman, a presentation consultant based out of Pleasanton, CA, USA is well known as the host of the annual Presentation Summit and has a strong sense of the needs of the presentation community. He has also authored books on PowerPoint.
In this conversation, Rick discusses the upcoming Presentation Summit being held in San Diego this October.
Geetesh: PowerPoint Live has been such a successful brand for seven years now. What prompted the change of name to the Presentation Summit?
Rick: We just felt that it was time to acknowledge that we're not just about PowerPoint training, that we cover the whole of the presentation process, from message, through design, slide creation, software technique, and delivery. There is just so much more to giving a good presentation than knowing how the software works.
Geetesh: And yet, almost everyone who attends the conference is a PowerPoint user.
Rick: That's right, they have that in common, no question. There will always be a track of seminars for nuts-and-bolts software technique, and we're sure that this year, many people will want to attend the sessions on PowerPoint version 2010 features.
Rick: Yes, there is a "but" coming! When you get people giving our keynotes like Nancy Duarte, Garr Reynolds, and Nigel Holmes (former art director for Time magazine), speaking on such dynamic and broad topics that transcend any particular piece of software, it just seems like a bit of a disconnect for the conference itself to have a relatively narrow name.
Geetesh: Will the name change signal a big change in the content?
Rick: Maybe no change at all, to be honest. There isn't much broken with the conference that needs fixing, in my view. This is about a change that has already taken place, evolution we have already undergone. When our regulars arrive this year, the biggest change will be the fact that they can walk about 100 feet from their hotel room to get to the beach.
Geetesh: Sounds dangerous, what if nobody attends the sessions?
Rick: They're all grownups; they make their own decisions about that!
Geetesh: Have you encountered any resistance to the name change?
Rick: Just the opposite, and I'll tell the story of one of our six-time conference patrons -- she missed only in 2004 -- who submitted her request to her supervisor to attend in 2009. He said to her, "how much PowerPoint training do you need? Don't you know it by now?"
Geetesh: You can only learn about animation for so long.
Rick: Exactly -- PowerPoint training should not be a lifelong journey! I don't blame the boss for scrutinizing that. She said it was a much easier sell this year with the conference name suggesting a broader treatment of topics around a discipline that very few people ever truly master.
Geetesh: Giving a good presentation might be a lifelong journey.
Rick: That's right, no matter how well you know the software, the art and science of delivering a truly engaging presentation and getting the results you hope for is a never-ending quest.
Geetesh: Not to mention that a "presentation" is such a moving target.
Rick: Tell me about it -- what's left of my hair will be gone come October from our just trying to keep up with the technology. It's scary to imagine that two years ago, nobody was talking about sharing presentations in the cloud and only a handful had given a webinar. And presenters were still telling people to turn their phones off -- now it's like "oh, and here's the Twitter tag for this talk, so you can be broadcasting this out to the rest of the universe."
Geetesh: Will you be covering all of that?
Rick: Absolutely. But hey, by October, it might be passe. There might be a whole new set of services and technologies to talk about.
Geetesh: This gets back to the whole question of content and whether the name change might result in some dilution of the topics. Do you think there is any danger of that?
Rick: I suppose we live with that danger every year -- the name change won't make it any more or less so. Choosing topics is equal parts lost art, black magic, and dumb luck, any conference organizer will tell you that. But I like the way we have structured the conference, because it allows us to keep a tight focus within a more diffuse framework. For instance, we have the track on technique for the PowerPoint hounds, and we offer a presentation design track for those who need help structuring the presentation, honing the message, or designing the slides. This year our third track is entitled Special Delivery, to pay homage to all of the ways, conventional and cutting-edge, that a presentation can be delivered to an audience. Of course, our Help Center keeps long hours to deal with specific questions and concerns that people have. And finally, we will have a fourth track this year that will remain completely blank when the conference begins and will be filled in with topics based entirely on requests from the patrons.
Geetesh: That is very responsive -- how will you pull that off?
Rick: Simple, we just won't sleep.
Categories: interviews, powerpoint, powerpointlive, presentationsummit
April 2003 | May 2003 | December 2003 | January 2004 | February 2004 | March 2004 | April 2004 | May 2004 | June 2004 | July 2004 | August 2004 | September 2004 | October 2004 | November 2004 | December 2004 | January 2005 | February 2005 | March 2005 | April 2005 | May 2005 | June 2005 | July 2005 | August 2005 | September 2005 | October 2005 | November 2005 | December 2005 | January 2006 | February 2006 | March 2006 | April 2006 | May 2006 | June 2006 | July 2006 | August 2006 | September 2006 | October 2006 | November 2006 | December 2006 | January 2007 | February 2007 | March 2007 | April 2007 | May 2007 | June 2007 | July 2007 | August 2007 | September 2007 | October 2007 | November 2007 | December 2007 | January 2008 | February 2008 | March 2008 | April 2008 | May 2008 | June 2008 | July 2008 | August 2008 | September 2008 | October 2008 | November 2008 | December 2008 | January 2009 | February 2009 | March 2009 | April 2009 | May 2009 | June 2009 | July 2009 | August 2009 | September 2009 | October 2009 | November 2009 | December 2009 | January 2010 | February 2010 | March 2010 | April 2010 | May 2010 | June 2010 | July 2010 | August 2010 | September 2010 | October 2010 | November 2010 | December 2010 | January 2011 | February 2011 | March 2011 | April 2011 | May 2011 | June 2011 | July 2011 | August 2011 | September 2011 | October 2011 | November 2011 | December 2011 | January 2012 | February 2012 | March 2012 | April 2012 | May 2012 | June 2012 | July 2012 | August 2012 | September 2012 | October 2012 | November 2012 | December 2012 | January 2013 | February 2013 | March 2013 | April 2013 | May 2013 | June 2013 | July 2013 | August 2013 | September 2013 | October 2013 | November 2013 | December 2013 | January 2014 | February 2014 | March 2014 | April 2014 | May 2014 | June 2014 | July 2014 | August 2014 | September 2014 | October 2014 | November 2014 | December 2014 | January 2015 | February 2015 | March 2015 | April 2015 | May 2015 | June 2015 | July 2015 | August 2015 | September 2015 | October 2015 | November 2015 | December 2015 | January 2016 | February 2016 | March 2016 | April 2016 | May 2016 | June 2016 | July 2016 | August 2016 | September 2016 | October 2016 | November 2016 | December 2016 | January 2017 | February 2017 | March 2017 |
Microsoft and the Office logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries.