Rick Altman, a presentation consultant based out of Pleasanton, CA, USA is well known as the host of the annual Presentation Summit and has a strong sense of the needs of the presentation community.
In this conversation, Rick discusses the just concluded Presentation Summit held in San Diego, and the next conference in this series to be held in Austin in September 2011.
Geetesh: Tell us more about the just concluded Presentation Summit.
Rick: In many ways, the Summit was a high-water mark for the conference. It was the first year of its new branding (having spent seven seasons as PowerPoint Live), and while we did not intentionally design our content any different, the event felt “broader” than in previous years. People have always sought more from us than just PowerPoint training, but this year the environment was even more dynamic.
Geetesh: Why do you think that was?
Rick: One reason for sure was our sharply-increased international participation. We had well over twice the number of patrons from countries outside of the United States than we usually attract, with every continent represented except for Antarctica. I don’t think that was a coincidence – if you are about to fly halfway around the world, are you going to do so for “PowerPoint training” or for “presentation skills development”? This might be largely a question of perception, but that perception came into sharp focus this year.
Geetesh: With so many sessions and interactions during the conference, what are the emerging trends that you see within the presentations industry?
Rick: Less is more. Everywhere you turned, you heard presenters espousing the need to hone and distill core messages. We saw Julie Terberg excising unnecessary text in her makeover sessions, I issued the “three-word challenge” during Monday’s general session, and in Tuesday’s keynote, Garr Reynolds extolled the virtues of “being naked.” In these myriad forms, the message became clear: don’t dump fully-composed thoughts on your slides. That’s Death by PowerPoint.
Geetesh: While the expression is well-known, is it just PowerPoint these days?
Rick: Obviously not, and that is certainly another emerging trend. We saw a sharp influx of Mac users this year and people who exhibited at least a passing interest in Keynote. One way or the other, you can expect our coverage of alternative software solutions to increase.
Geetesh: The next Presentation Summit is going to be held in Austin – why did you chose Austin?
Rick: That city has been on my personal radar for over a decade. It is a vibrant, dynamic, progressive city right in the heart of the country. It has wonderful restaurants, more live music than anywhere else in the USA, and great fall weather. So it is no wonder that the entire room let out a collective cheer when we made the announcement.
Geetesh: What can patrons look forward to?
Rick: They can look forward to our continuing to address their current needs while anticipating their future ones. They can expect the absolute highest caliber of talent amassed for those four days. And they can help with the ongoing evolution of one of the greatest communities I have ever been a part of – those who craft and deliver presentation content. Until you have been to the conference, you just can’t imagine the vitality, the energy, the almost intoxicating excitement from over 200 people all coming together to celebrate their common passion. It’s so cool I want to do it all over again next week. But I’ll wait until next September…
See Also: Presentation Summit 2010: Conversation with Rick Altman
Categories: interviews, powerpoint, powerpointlive, presentationsummit
April 2003 | May 2003 | December 2003 | January 2004 | February 2004 | March 2004 | April 2004 | May 2004 | June 2004 | July 2004 | August 2004 | September 2004 | October 2004 | November 2004 | December 2004 | January 2005 | February 2005 | March 2005 | April 2005 | May 2005 | June 2005 | July 2005 | August 2005 | September 2005 | October 2005 | November 2005 | December 2005 | January 2006 | February 2006 | March 2006 | April 2006 | May 2006 | June 2006 | July 2006 | August 2006 | September 2006 | October 2006 | November 2006 | December 2006 | January 2007 | February 2007 | March 2007 | April 2007 | May 2007 | June 2007 | July 2007 | August 2007 | September 2007 | October 2007 | November 2007 | December 2007 | January 2008 | February 2008 | March 2008 | April 2008 | May 2008 | June 2008 | July 2008 | August 2008 | September 2008 | October 2008 | November 2008 | December 2008 | January 2009 | February 2009 | March 2009 | April 2009 | May 2009 | June 2009 | July 2009 | August 2009 | September 2009 | October 2009 | November 2009 | December 2009 | January 2010 | February 2010 | March 2010 | April 2010 | May 2010 | June 2010 | July 2010 | August 2010 | September 2010 | October 2010 | November 2010 | December 2010 | January 2011 | February 2011 | March 2011 | April 2011 | May 2011 | June 2011 | July 2011 | August 2011 | September 2011 | October 2011 | November 2011 | December 2011 | January 2012 | February 2012 | March 2012 | April 2012 | May 2012 | June 2012 | July 2012 | August 2012 | September 2012 | October 2012 | November 2012 | December 2012 | January 2013 | February 2013 | March 2013 | April 2013 | May 2013 | June 2013 | July 2013 | August 2013 | September 2013 | October 2013 | November 2013 | December 2013 | January 2014 | February 2014 | March 2014 | April 2014 | May 2014 | June 2014 | July 2014 | August 2014 | September 2014 | October 2014 | November 2014 | December 2014 | January 2015 | February 2015 | March 2015 | April 2015 | May 2015 | June 2015 | July 2015 | August 2015 | September 2015 | October 2015 | November 2015 | December 2015 | January 2016 | February 2016 | March 2016 | April 2016 | May 2016 | June 2016 | July 2016 | August 2016 | September 2016 | October 2016 | November 2016 | December 2016 | January 2017 | February 2017 | March 2017 |
Microsoft and the Office logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries.