Tom Bunzel specializes in knowing what other presenters need and how to make technology work. He has appeared on Tech TV's Call for Help as "Professor PowerPoint" and is a featured speaker at InfoComm and Presentation Summit each year. Tom is also a "technology coach" and does presentation and video consulting in southern California. Tom can be reached through his site, The Presentation Professor and his BunzBlog blog.
In this conversation, Tom discusses his new book, Tools of Engagement: Presenting and Training in a World of Social Media.
Geetesh: Huge changes have evolved so quickly in the world of social media, and these impact almost any presenter in some way or the other. Other than as a resource for keeping readers informed about these changes, what motivated you to author Tools of Engagement?
Tom: As I watched the emergence of MySpace, Facebook and Twitter, among other new programs I began to wonder about the impact on the presentations space where we work; and when I asked presenters at various conferences who spoke about social media, I noted that very few if any had given any thought to how their own tools would affect or inform their own talks.
At the same time I have long sensed that communicating effectively with a tool like PowerPoint, for example, involves building a connection to an audience. Speakers like Nancy Duarte, Rick Altman, Jim Endicott and others emphasize this point often and well—and it is precisely these tools that can empower a presenter to enter a room with rapport established—perhaps through a blog augmented by the social tools—and then continue the dialog with an audience after the main event is over…
It occurred to me that the very nature of presentations has changed from a single high impact event to essentially an ongoing conversation, and that audiences now expect to be part of the process at every stage and also be heard. The sometimes dreaded Backchannel of chatter during a presentation is an excellent example of this.
And on this point, when I attended an event for the Social Media Club of L.A. just before writing the book, there were two giant screens—both had the Twitter feed and NOT a PowerPoint slide show, and panelists were responding to tweets from the audience, the general public, and comments from one another.
This convinced me that a thorough examination of the nature of engagement and the tools that make it happen effectively was and is warranted, and I began writing the book.
Geetesh: How is training different from presenting, and what are the unique challenges faced by trainers coping with and taking advantage of the social media onslaught.
Tom: Briefly I see training as one particular area of presenting—namely the imparting of knowledge and/or skills while overall presenting can involve persuasion, inspiration, sales and a number of other factors or motivations.
What’s interesting is that social media in many ways has blurred the distinction between marketing and training, because learning about stuff is such a great value proposition and that is essentially the currency of social tools—providing value to others.
And when you include the trust factor, namely that people online tend to trust one another’s insights and opinions more than establishment figures or authorities, you really have the basis for education and training—when the social sphere gives you credibility you have really earned it and can impart your point of view on many issues.
Therefore, establishing a presence through a blog, active participation in other blogs, answering questions on LinkedIn, being active on Twitter and Facebook with valuable information, and so on, is an invaluable foundation for a trainer in being able to get and hold the attention of an audience.
Again, younger audiences now expect this, and failing to build rapport in this way will probably get a trainer criticized even during an event on the Backchannel.
On the other hand, effectively laying the groundwork for training through these tools, using the research garnered during the training (for example, to assess needs—precisely what does the audience want to learn?), using the tools like web conferencing geared specifically to training like Citrix GoToTraining, and finally following up on sessions afterwards with commentary and discussion on socials tools is a powerful way to make training more effective and increase ROI.
Sales presentations and the like can also certainly take advantage of these tools as well; but again, in many ways the most effective marketing now involves not selling per se, but informing about the value of a product or service, which is really training as well.
Finally I have been focusing on how our main tool, PowerPoint, can be leveraged online using video with the presenter available, hosted on a site like YouTube, and then made available through blogs and links on Facebook or Twitter, to set the stage for training, follow up on an event, or allow people to experience training who could not physically attend a specific session.
Video is a big part of the social media scene, and it’s remarkable how many videos now include slides with narration to tell a story—and this particularly significant in the training space.
Categories: books, interviews, powerpoint, social_media
Tom Bunzel is so perceptive about the potential of new technology to improve the way to transfer information whether in sales presentations or technical training. He has seen the changes and been out in front everytime.
April 2003 | May 2003 | December 2003 | January 2004 | February 2004 | March 2004 | April 2004 | May 2004 | June 2004 | July 2004 | August 2004 | September 2004 | October 2004 | November 2004 | December 2004 | January 2005 | February 2005 | March 2005 | April 2005 | May 2005 | June 2005 | July 2005 | August 2005 | September 2005 | October 2005 | November 2005 | December 2005 | January 2006 | February 2006 | March 2006 | April 2006 | May 2006 | June 2006 | July 2006 | August 2006 | September 2006 | October 2006 | November 2006 | December 2006 | January 2007 | February 2007 | March 2007 | April 2007 | May 2007 | June 2007 | July 2007 | August 2007 | September 2007 | October 2007 | November 2007 | December 2007 | January 2008 | February 2008 | March 2008 | April 2008 | May 2008 | June 2008 | July 2008 | August 2008 | September 2008 | October 2008 | November 2008 | December 2008 | January 2009 | February 2009 | March 2009 | April 2009 | May 2009 | June 2009 | July 2009 | August 2009 | September 2009 | October 2009 | November 2009 | December 2009 | January 2010 | February 2010 | March 2010 | April 2010 | May 2010 | June 2010 | July 2010 | August 2010 | September 2010 | October 2010 | November 2010 | December 2010 | January 2011 | February 2011 | March 2011 | April 2011 | May 2011 | June 2011 | July 2011 | August 2011 | September 2011 | October 2011 | November 2011 | December 2011 | January 2012 | February 2012 | March 2012 | April 2012 | May 2012 | June 2012 | July 2012 | August 2012 | September 2012 | October 2012 | November 2012 | December 2012 | January 2013 | February 2013 | March 2013 | April 2013 | May 2013 | June 2013 | July 2013 | August 2013 | September 2013 | October 2013 | November 2013 | December 2013 | January 2014 | February 2014 | March 2014 | April 2014 | May 2014 | June 2014 | July 2014 | August 2014 | September 2014 | October 2014 | November 2014 | December 2014 | January 2015 | February 2015 | March 2015 | April 2015 | May 2015 | June 2015 | July 2015 | August 2015 | September 2015 | October 2015 | November 2015 | December 2015 | January 2016 | February 2016 | March 2016 | April 2016 | May 2016 | June 2016 | July 2016 | August 2016 | September 2016 | October 2016 | November 2016 | December 2016 | January 2017 | February 2017 | March 2017 |
Microsoft and the Office logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries.