Michael Kolowich is founder and CEO of KnowledgeVision, which has developed tools for creating, managing, and distributing synchronized interactive online video presentations for communications, marketing, training, and sales professionals. He writes regularly about online presentations at his blog.
This is a guest post by Michael for Indezine.com -- do note that the content in this post is his opinion, and not necessarily endorsed by this site.
I don't know about you, but I'm getting a little tired of the "disembodied voice" approach to online presentations. Whether it’s through webinars or online meetings or voiced-over sales decks, there's no denying that the narrated online presentation has started to gain traction. But this popularity comes at a cost: most online presentations, to be blunt, lack personality.
Think back over the last couple of years to the most memorable and impactful presentations you’ve seen. And if you haven’t seen any lately, go to TED and take in a couple of the so-called "TED Talks". Or reflect on some of the great lectures you might have seen in college. Or look at what Steve Jobs does with his product launch presentations. Great presentations are, at their core, performance art, augmented by the power of illustration in the form of powerful images and provocative text. Great presenters are storytellers, and they tell those stories with every tool they have – with the inflection of their voice, with their gestures, with their facial expressions, with the images they show, and with the useful handouts they pass around.
A voiced-over online presentation is handicapped right from the start, because the speaker is denied many of the communication tools that are available to a live presenter. What's more, presentation narrators often compound the problem by reading from a script, further stripping the personality from the experience.
While narrated presentations certainly have their place as a quick-and-dirty tool in an online communications portfolio, they are hardly the way to put a company’s best foot forward – especially with an organization's best communicators.
Fortunately, online video presentation tools like KnowledgeVision are now emerging that are easy, affordable, and powerful. And I'm not talking about just dropping video clips into a presentation; I'm talking about a fully-synchronized reproduction of a presentation experience, with all the body language and nuance of the storyteller. Take a look at this 6-minute example of an online video presentation and I think you’ll see what I mean.
Too expensive to produce? Hardly. At a time when most teenagers know how to create and upload video clips to YouTube, video capture and uploading skills are everywhere you look. And the best video online presentation platforms can create quite serviceable "ad-hoc" presentations right from a webcam, plugged into your computer's USB port. Video online presentations can be produced in literally minutes from any computer, anywhere an internet connection can be found, with no special equipment.
Today's most advanced online presentation platforms don’t stop at video synchronization, though. They further enhance the experience by providing just-in-time footnotes, virtual handouts, calls to action, forms, quizzes, surveys, interactive transcripts, and other tools as part of the entire interactive experience. And they augment that experience with powerful analytics that show how the presentation material is being viewed and interacted with.
Will this spell the end of audio-only narrated presentations? Hardly. Both narrated presentations and fully-synchronized video presentations have a place in a company's communications portfolio at every level – from the corporate communications and training departments to product managers and sales reps. And now that both capabilities can be found in a single flexible tool, there's no reason not to spread that capability widely in an organization.
Categories: guest_post, powerpoint
April 2003 | May 2003 | December 2003 | January 2004 | February 2004 | March 2004 | April 2004 | May 2004 | June 2004 | July 2004 | August 2004 | September 2004 | October 2004 | November 2004 | December 2004 | January 2005 | February 2005 | March 2005 | April 2005 | May 2005 | June 2005 | July 2005 | August 2005 | September 2005 | October 2005 | November 2005 | December 2005 | January 2006 | February 2006 | March 2006 | April 2006 | May 2006 | June 2006 | July 2006 | August 2006 | September 2006 | October 2006 | November 2006 | December 2006 | January 2007 | February 2007 | March 2007 | April 2007 | May 2007 | June 2007 | July 2007 | August 2007 | September 2007 | October 2007 | November 2007 | December 2007 | January 2008 | February 2008 | March 2008 | April 2008 | May 2008 | June 2008 | July 2008 | August 2008 | September 2008 | October 2008 | November 2008 | December 2008 | January 2009 | February 2009 | March 2009 | April 2009 | May 2009 | June 2009 | July 2009 | August 2009 | September 2009 | October 2009 | November 2009 | December 2009 | January 2010 | February 2010 | March 2010 | April 2010 | May 2010 | June 2010 | July 2010 | August 2010 | September 2010 | October 2010 | November 2010 | December 2010 | January 2011 | February 2011 | March 2011 | April 2011 | May 2011 | June 2011 | July 2011 | August 2011 | September 2011 | October 2011 | November 2011 | December 2011 | January 2012 | February 2012 | March 2012 | April 2012 | May 2012 | June 2012 | July 2012 | August 2012 | September 2012 | October 2012 | November 2012 | December 2012 | January 2013 | February 2013 | March 2013 | April 2013 | May 2013 | June 2013 | July 2013 | August 2013 | September 2013 | October 2013 | November 2013 | December 2013 | January 2014 | February 2014 | March 2014 | April 2014 | May 2014 | June 2014 | July 2014 | August 2014 | September 2014 | October 2014 | November 2014 | December 2014 | January 2015 | February 2015 | March 2015 | April 2015 | May 2015 | June 2015 | July 2015 | August 2015 | September 2015 | October 2015 | November 2015 | December 2015 | January 2016 | February 2016 | March 2016 | April 2016 | May 2016 | June 2016 | July 2016 | August 2016 | September 2016 | October 2016 |
Microsoft and the Office logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries.