Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words?
A picture is worth a thousand words -- we've all heard that a thousand times and more. Frankly speaking, that observation may not be true all the time! So what are those scenarios when this is not true?
Actually, there are so many scenarios that I had to share an entire list with you!
- Speak your picture's story: A picture on a slide can certainly tell a story, but that story needs to be retold by the presenter. Many presenters and slide designers take the analogy of a picture being equal to a thousand words quite literally -- and while they believe a message or story has been provided to the audience, it is quite possible that the audience thought of a different story -- especially since the presenter did not explain why he or she had to show a picture of an airplane in a presentation about managing finances!
- Relevance is the key: A picture is only effective if it is relevant to the content of your slide -- just any picture will not work. In situations like this, it is better not to use a picture than using the wrong visual. Many times, slide designers and presenters fall into this trap of using a visual that is so generic that it might be used to explain a hundred concepts. A classic example is a picture of the light bulb, or a picture of people shaking hands. These cliche pictures have been used so often, and audiences have seen them in so many slides -- resulting in them not being so relevant any more!
- Use fewer pictures: More than one picture to illustrate a single concept is a picture too many. Remember, two pictures may not be worth two thousand words! Yes, you can use multiple pictures if one builds upon the other. For example, you may show a famous building in one picture, and a close-up of some carving on its exterior in another picture. That way, the second picture would add value to the first picture.
- Explore silhouettes: A picture that distinctly shows a human being of one race may not work too well in a multi-racial or international audience -- in that case, explore using silhouettes. It is surprising how much more you can express with a mere silhouette.
- Captions describe pictures: A picture worth a thousand words sometimes may need a caption of five to seven words -- don't shy from using captions that explain the picture!
- Pictures of the same style stay together: The right picture style is also important. The contemporary trend for the last few years has been to use photographs rather than cartoon-style clip art. However, do remember that a commissioned cartoon is entirely different from cartoon-style clip art -- if you use a great cartoon that has a message which is relevant to your presentation, then that's very acceptable. As already mentioned earlier, silhouettes are also a great option.
- Pristine pictures speak better: Picture quality is a very significant issue. Do not use visuals that are blurred, pixelated, or pictures that are out of focus.
- Crop out the unrequired: Picture cropping can be very useful. Try to crop to an area of the picture where you want to focus the audience's attention.
- Respect copyrights: Finally, any picture worth a thousand words is worth none at all if you do not respect copyrights. Don't steal images from online image searches. In future blog posts, I'll explore how you can get great pictures for free or almost next to nothing -- and also why you should respect copyrights.
April 2003 | May 2003 | December 2003 | January 2004 | February 2004 | March 2004 | April 2004 | May 2004 | June 2004 | July 2004 | August 2004 | September 2004 | October 2004 | November 2004 | December 2004 | January 2005 | February 2005 | March 2005 | April 2005 | May 2005 | June 2005 | July 2005 | August 2005 | September 2005 | October 2005 | November 2005 | December 2005 | January 2006 | February 2006 | March 2006 | April 2006 | May 2006 | June 2006 | July 2006 | August 2006 | September 2006 | October 2006 | November 2006 | December 2006 | January 2007 | February 2007 | March 2007 | April 2007 | May 2007 | June 2007 | July 2007 | August 2007 | September 2007 | October 2007 | November 2007 | December 2007 | January 2008 | February 2008 | March 2008 | April 2008 | May 2008 | June 2008 | July 2008 | August 2008 | September 2008 | October 2008 | November 2008 | December 2008 | January 2009 | February 2009 | March 2009 | April 2009 | May 2009 | June 2009 | July 2009 | August 2009 | September 2009 | October 2009 | November 2009 | December 2009 | January 2010 | February 2010 | March 2010 | April 2010 | May 2010 | June 2010 | July 2010 | August 2010 | September 2010 | October 2010 | November 2010 | December 2010 | January 2011 | February 2011 | March 2011 | April 2011 | May 2011 | June 2011 | July 2011 | August 2011 | September 2011 | October 2011 | November 2011 | December 2011 | January 2012 | February 2012 | March 2012 | April 2012 | May 2012 | June 2012 | July 2012 | August 2012 | September 2012 | October 2012 | November 2012 | December 2012 | January 2013 | February 2013 | March 2013 | April 2013 | May 2013 |
Microsoft and the Office logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries.