Phillip Gibbs has been involved in the audio-visual production business for 25 years and co-founded IMS Communications, an events production business, in 1991. Over time, clients’ expectations for their conferences have climbed higher and higher; they want them to be memorable and efficient in communicating their messages. They also want them to be eye-catching and to run as smoothly as a TV programme. As technology has changed, shows have become slicker requiring custom software to manipulate graphics, video and interactive devices. IMS designers have taken this development one step further – to help presenters keep to time.
In this conversation, Phillip discusses PresenterClock, a PowerPoint add-in that allows presenters to be on schedule.
Geetesh: Tell us about your PresenterClock add-in for PowerPoint, and what motivated you to create this product?
Phillip: The core part of our services involves producing large events, usually conferences. A problem we often encounter is getting presenters to stick to their allotted time. If one or more speakers over-run, it has an impact on everything else for that event such as timings of sessions, breaks, catering arrangements, and delegate travel plans. Even a well-rehearsed presentation can overrun!
We had investigated various systems to rectify the problem but all were expensive and cumbersome to operate. We initially developed the PresenterClock to show presenters exactly how much time they have left as part of our bespoke software we use to run the show. This was linked to each session allowing the allocated time for each presenter to be pre-programmed and automatically started when the session changed to the new presenter (overcoming one of downsides of standalone clocks).
We also wanted to be able to send messages to the presenters informing them of any changes that may have arisen; maybe the next presenter is held up in traffic, a quick on screen message is quicker and far neater than walking onstage with a piece of paper!
From experience we found that presenters often lost their flow because they couldn't remember what was coming up next so we thought having a large area showing the next slide was crucial. The presenter notes feature followed from a client request.
We then saw an opportunity to turn this into a commercial product, and the integration into PowerPoint made perfect sense. A problem we had to overcome was of the third video output as PresenterClock requires 3 screens; this is where the USB to VGA adapter comes in. Once we had this final piece of the puzzle we went on to develop the PowerPoint add-in.
Geetesh: Although PresenterClock works on a third display, how different is it from PowerPoint’s own Presenter View – does it add any extra features not found in Presenter View?
Phillip: PresenterClock isn't designed to be a replacement for the Presenter View. As mentioned earlier, its original main purpose is to replace a traffic light system and show how much time the presenter has left. It shows the next slide and presenter notes which is an obvious added bonus over these systems. Presenter View is more of an operator view, and as such is designed to be used at smaller, more informal presentations, where time is not an issue.
However, if we are comparing the two, the most noticeable additional features are the countdown function (both as a digital clock and as a visually prominent time bar) as well as the change of colour as the presenter nears the end of their time slot. Another important advantage is that multiple presenter timings can be inserted within a presentation containing numerous presenters. In this way each presenter can see their time slot and the number of slides specific to their presentation which isn't possible with Presenter View.
Categories: add-in, delivery, interviews, powerpoint
April 2003 | May 2003 | December 2003 | January 2004 | February 2004 | March 2004 | April 2004 | May 2004 | June 2004 | July 2004 | August 2004 | September 2004 | October 2004 | November 2004 | December 2004 | January 2005 | February 2005 | March 2005 | April 2005 | May 2005 | June 2005 | July 2005 | August 2005 | September 2005 | October 2005 | November 2005 | December 2005 | January 2006 | February 2006 | March 2006 | April 2006 | May 2006 | June 2006 | July 2006 | August 2006 | September 2006 | October 2006 | November 2006 | December 2006 | January 2007 | February 2007 | March 2007 | April 2007 | May 2007 | June 2007 | July 2007 | August 2007 | September 2007 | October 2007 | November 2007 | December 2007 | January 2008 | February 2008 | March 2008 | April 2008 | May 2008 | June 2008 | July 2008 | August 2008 | September 2008 | October 2008 | November 2008 | December 2008 | January 2009 | February 2009 | March 2009 | April 2009 | May 2009 | June 2009 | July 2009 | August 2009 | September 2009 | October 2009 | November 2009 | December 2009 | January 2010 | February 2010 | March 2010 | April 2010 | May 2010 | June 2010 | July 2010 | August 2010 | September 2010 | October 2010 | November 2010 | December 2010 | January 2011 | February 2011 | March 2011 | April 2011 | May 2011 | June 2011 | July 2011 | August 2011 | September 2011 | October 2011 | November 2011 | December 2011 | January 2012 | February 2012 | March 2012 | April 2012 | May 2012 | June 2012 | July 2012 | August 2012 | September 2012 | October 2012 | November 2012 | December 2012 | January 2013 | February 2013 | March 2013 | April 2013 | May 2013 | June 2013 | July 2013 | August 2013 | September 2013 | October 2013 | November 2013 | December 2013 | January 2014 | February 2014 | March 2014 | April 2014 | May 2014 | June 2014 | July 2014 | August 2014 | September 2014 | October 2014 | November 2014 | December 2014 | January 2015 | February 2015 | March 2015 | April 2015 | May 2015 | June 2015 | July 2015 | August 2015 | September 2015 | October 2015 | November 2015 | December 2015 | January 2016 | February 2016 | March 2016 | April 2016 | May 2016 | June 2016 | July 2016 | August 2016 | September 2016 | October 2016 | November 2016 | December 2016 | January 2017 | February 2017 | March 2017 |
Microsoft and the Office logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries.