Higgs Boson, Comic Sans, and Bad PowerPoint!
OK, the title of this post is a little confusing, and I wish there was a simpler title I could use -- but in all fairness to the three nuances of this post, I had to have them all in the title! Let's start with some introductions:
- Higgs Boson, often called the "God particle" is a proposed elementary particle in the Standard Model of particle physics -- let's just say that scientists have called this a great breakthrough.
- Comic Sans is a typeface released by Microsoft in 1994 -- the typeface is hugely popular and has been severely criticized for its lack of aesthetics. That criticism though has made no dent in Comic Sans' huge popularity. It often shows up on PowerPoint slides -- and people either love it or hate it -- almost no one is indifferent to this typeface.
- Bad PowerPoint is well, just a bunch of really bad PowerPoint slides!
Look at this article on the Guardian site. The article explores criticism caused by the use of Comic Sans in all the Higgs Boson slides. Love this comment on the same page:
I don't get this rabid hatred of Comic Sans. However, many scientists are scared that if their presentation looks anything less than boringly stiff and formal with standard Helvetica, someone with influence on the grants committees will see it and mark down their next application. Never mind the science ... he, she or it uses Comic Sans.
Kudos to CERN for bucking this trend, although I suspect it's just down to an individual assigned to making the slides and no-one bothered to change this aspect.
Memo to self: as Comic Sans p*ss*s people off, must remember to use it more often.
So that was about Higgs Boson and Comic Sans. But it looks like Comic Sans was the least of the problems on the CERN slides. The slides themselves were very, very bad. In fact they are great examples of bad PowerPoint -- so bad that PowerPoint designers would love to create makeovers with them!
Don't believe? Take a look yourself -- the CERN folks have these slides available on their site for public to download. Here's a link to a great example of a bad presentation -- it's a 25 mb download for the PPTX file. For those of you who would rather not download the PowerPoint slides, you can see them on SlideShare:
Thanks to Echo Swinford, Ellen Finkelstein, and Julie Terberg.
You can also follow this discussion on our LinkedIn group.
Categories: opinion, powerpoint
One word for this deck: YUK!
You were right about designers wanting to do a makeover on this one.
Too bad people are still using PowerPoint in such a bad way. Guess that leaves a lot of potential for us then, right? ;-)
April 2003 | May 2003 | December 2003 | January 2004 | February 2004 | March 2004 | April 2004 | May 2004 | June 2004 | July 2004 | August 2004 | September 2004 | October 2004 | November 2004 | December 2004 | January 2005 | February 2005 | March 2005 | April 2005 | May 2005 | June 2005 | July 2005 | August 2005 | September 2005 | October 2005 | November 2005 | December 2005 | January 2006 | February 2006 | March 2006 | April 2006 | May 2006 | June 2006 | July 2006 | August 2006 | September 2006 | October 2006 | November 2006 | December 2006 | January 2007 | February 2007 | March 2007 | April 2007 | May 2007 | June 2007 | July 2007 | August 2007 | September 2007 | October 2007 | November 2007 | December 2007 | January 2008 | February 2008 | March 2008 | April 2008 | May 2008 | June 2008 | July 2008 | August 2008 | September 2008 | October 2008 | November 2008 | December 2008 | January 2009 | February 2009 | March 2009 | April 2009 | May 2009 | June 2009 | July 2009 | August 2009 | September 2009 | October 2009 | November 2009 | December 2009 | January 2010 | February 2010 | March 2010 | April 2010 | May 2010 | June 2010 | July 2010 | August 2010 | September 2010 | October 2010 | November 2010 | December 2010 | January 2011 | February 2011 | March 2011 | April 2011 | May 2011 | June 2011 | July 2011 | August 2011 | September 2011 | October 2011 | November 2011 | December 2011 | January 2012 | February 2012 | March 2012 | April 2012 | May 2012 | June 2012 | July 2012 | August 2012 | September 2012 | October 2012 | November 2012 | December 2012 | January 2013 | February 2013 | March 2013 | April 2013 | May 2013 |
Microsoft and the Office logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries.