Business presentations are increasingly becoming visual. Slide decks are being used more as visual aids for audiences than as memory joggers for presenters. In this article, we explore the specific roles played by two common visual tools -viz. stock photos and diagrams in business presentations.
Even though the terms "photos" and "diagrams" are quite common, the difference between the two tools is not clearly defined. So, let us take a minute to spell out the difference as we see it:
Both the tools have their place in a business presentation. The key is to know where to use them for maximum impact.
Many presenters use stock photos merely as decorative backdrops. For example, take a look at this slide:
Though the photo sets the context for the text, there is no "information loss" when you remove the picture.
The best way to use a stock photo is to define its purpose right up front. Use it when you want to show a specific object, place or person. Or use it to capture emotions. Here is an example:
We find that stock photos are more useful for "big picture" presentations by C-suite big wigs than for content rich presentations by a typical business executive.
Most business presentations appeal to logic than to emotions. That is why, diagrams play a far larger role in communicating a business message. Here are three situations where you are better off using a diagram than a picture:
It is always a good idea to use diagrams to explain a concept. For example, when you want to show multiple stages in a recruitment process a typical "captioned photo" slide may look as follows:
Though the photo sets the context for the topic, it hijacks the attention of your audience. Instead, a simple diagram like this is more suited to communicate your message effectively:
As you can see in this case, the diagram adds meaning to the message. Removing the diagram would make this slide "lose" information.
It is difficult to use purposeful custom animation on stock photos. Whereas, you can explain your message in simple incremental steps using diagrams. For example, if you want to explain the need to maintain a constant sales pipeline, you can use the following diagram with relevant custom animation:
Custom animation allows you to pause, engage and proceed with your slides. Good diagrams allow you to use custom animation to your advantage.
A diagram allows you to operate beyond your slides and hence creates better audience engagement. For example, you can draw a diagram on a white board and switch around the elements in the diagram based on audience feedback.
In short, the roles of photos and diagrams can be summarized using this simple flow chart (a diagram):
So, make your next presentation remarkable by using the right visual tool.
Another advantage of using diagrams is -- you can create them yourself without having to spend money on monthly subscriptions to stock photo sites. If you are too busy to create professional diagrams from the scratch, you can get high quality diagram templates from Presentation Process. The diagrams you saw in this article are from the site.
M. S. Ramgopal worked in 2 multinational companies for over 15 years and during this time, he noticed a void in the presentation skill levels of business executives. Many of them had brilliant ideas, but they lacked the skills necessary to sell those ideas effectively.
To help others present their ideas better and reach their true potential, Ramgopal and his wife, Arte, started the website Presentation Process. You can visit their site to find free advanced PowerPoint tutorials and creative presentation ideas for business presentations.
Categories: graphics, guest_post, powerpoint
April 2003 | May 2003 | December 2003 | January 2004 | February 2004 | March 2004 | April 2004 | May 2004 | June 2004 | July 2004 | August 2004 | September 2004 | October 2004 | November 2004 | December 2004 | January 2005 | February 2005 | March 2005 | April 2005 | May 2005 | June 2005 | July 2005 | August 2005 | September 2005 | October 2005 | November 2005 | December 2005 | January 2006 | February 2006 | March 2006 | April 2006 | May 2006 | June 2006 | July 2006 | August 2006 | September 2006 | October 2006 | November 2006 | December 2006 | January 2007 | February 2007 | March 2007 | April 2007 | May 2007 | June 2007 | July 2007 | August 2007 | September 2007 | October 2007 | November 2007 | December 2007 | January 2008 | February 2008 | March 2008 | April 2008 | May 2008 | June 2008 | July 2008 | August 2008 | September 2008 | October 2008 | November 2008 | December 2008 | January 2009 | February 2009 | March 2009 | April 2009 | May 2009 | June 2009 | July 2009 | August 2009 | September 2009 | October 2009 | November 2009 | December 2009 | January 2010 | February 2010 | March 2010 | April 2010 | May 2010 | June 2010 | July 2010 | August 2010 | September 2010 | October 2010 | November 2010 | December 2010 | January 2011 | February 2011 | March 2011 | April 2011 | May 2011 | June 2011 | July 2011 | August 2011 | September 2011 | October 2011 | November 2011 | December 2011 | January 2012 | February 2012 | March 2012 | April 2012 | May 2012 | June 2012 | July 2012 | August 2012 | September 2012 | October 2012 | November 2012 | December 2012 | January 2013 | February 2013 | March 2013 | April 2013 | May 2013 | June 2013 | July 2013 | August 2013 | September 2013 | October 2013 | November 2013 | December 2013 | January 2014 | February 2014 | March 2014 | April 2014 | May 2014 | June 2014 | July 2014 | August 2014 | September 2014 | October 2014 | November 2014 | December 2014 | January 2015 | February 2015 | March 2015 | April 2015 | May 2015 | June 2015 | July 2015 | August 2015 | September 2015 | October 2015 | November 2015 | December 2015 | January 2016 | February 2016 | March 2016 | April 2016 | May 2016 | June 2016 | July 2016 | August 2016 | September 2016 | October 2016 |
Microsoft and the Office logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries.