Sam Thatte is a presentation consultant and trainer specializing in helping businesses create content and visuals that are engaging and memorable. Along with presentation design and content development, Sam also conducts workshops and classes to teach presentation skills to businesses as well as individuals. Learn more at his website and blog.
In this discussion, Sam discusses his free report on presentation titles called Vital Title - The How and Why of Presentation Titles.
Geetesh: Why is it important to use an awesome, attention seeking title for your presentations and slides?
Sam: Can you imagine a book that you wrote, being called the XYZ Book #8. Or a movie by Steven Spielberg being named, "Spielberg's 18th movie" We all see great titles on book covers and in the movies. We even see titles for plays and the theater. Most of us pick up a book to read or a movie to watch based on what the title is. Yet, when it comes to presentations we are giving, we don’t feel that great titles are necessary. Either that, or we don't feel like our presentations are worthy of great titles.
Now I am not claiming that presentation titles do not exist at all. What I am claiming and hope to influence is that titles for a presentation are last on the minds of presenters. We go through the process of planning content, building our slides and practicing our presentations in great detail. And at the end of it, when we are asked about the title, we either call it a lackluster name like, "HR Goals for 2nd Quarter" or "Sales team presentation" or if we are feeling really bold, "Top 5 Best Practices for growing Sales".
One big benefit that you get from creating attention seeking titles is that they help the audience understand why you are giving a presentation. I have been to lots of business presentations where I knew the name of the person presenting, I knew what company he belonged to and that was it! I had no idea what he was going to talk about. I didn't know if his talk was important to me or even relevant to what I do and need. A strong title helps the audience understand what to expect from your presentation. As an audience member, when I have the time to process that information, I get much more out of the presentation because I was anticipating what was to come during the presentation. On the other hand, If I feel from the title that the presentation would not be helpful to me, I am now empowered to forgo attending a presentation that may not be of interest to me.
There are a couple of other benefits that are very helpful for you, the presenter. And I would love for you to read about those in the report.
Geetesh: Tell us more about your Vital Title report, and what motivated you to create this book?
Sam: One of the biggest reasons why we do not create attention getting titles for presentations is because a lot of us don't like to commit to delivering a presentation that is confined to what the title conveys. It creates a box within which we are now required to operate during the presentation. It also sets a higher standard for the presentation which the presenter then has to maintain. And all of that is hard work. But we fail to look at the same things as benefits. If the presentation is limited to a specific topic, it is a benefit. If I as a presenter am not able to talk about 5 other things that do not pertain to my presentation, that is a benefit. I hope to inspire readers and presenters to get creative and adopt some of the methods I have explained in the report to strengthen their presentations with titles that spark the audience's imagination.
Categories: interviews, powerpoint, presentation_skills
April 2003 | May 2003 | December 2003 | January 2004 | February 2004 | March 2004 | April 2004 | May 2004 | June 2004 | July 2004 | August 2004 | September 2004 | October 2004 | November 2004 | December 2004 | January 2005 | February 2005 | March 2005 | April 2005 | May 2005 | June 2005 | July 2005 | August 2005 | September 2005 | October 2005 | November 2005 | December 2005 | January 2006 | February 2006 | March 2006 | April 2006 | May 2006 | June 2006 | July 2006 | August 2006 | September 2006 | October 2006 | November 2006 | December 2006 | January 2007 | February 2007 | March 2007 | April 2007 | May 2007 | June 2007 | July 2007 | August 2007 | September 2007 | October 2007 | November 2007 | December 2007 | January 2008 | February 2008 | March 2008 | April 2008 | May 2008 | June 2008 | July 2008 | August 2008 | September 2008 | October 2008 | November 2008 | December 2008 | January 2009 | February 2009 | March 2009 | April 2009 | May 2009 | June 2009 | July 2009 | August 2009 | September 2009 | October 2009 | November 2009 | December 2009 | January 2010 | February 2010 | March 2010 | April 2010 | May 2010 | June 2010 | July 2010 | August 2010 | September 2010 | October 2010 | November 2010 | December 2010 | January 2011 | February 2011 | March 2011 | April 2011 | May 2011 | June 2011 | July 2011 | August 2011 | September 2011 | October 2011 | November 2011 | December 2011 | January 2012 | February 2012 | March 2012 | April 2012 | May 2012 | June 2012 | July 2012 | August 2012 | September 2012 | October 2012 | November 2012 | December 2012 | January 2013 | February 2013 | March 2013 | April 2013 | May 2013 | June 2013 | July 2013 | August 2013 | September 2013 | October 2013 | November 2013 | December 2013 | January 2014 | February 2014 | March 2014 | April 2014 | May 2014 | June 2014 | July 2014 | August 2014 | September 2014 | October 2014 | November 2014 | December 2014 | January 2015 | February 2015 | March 2015 | April 2015 | May 2015 | June 2015 | July 2015 |
Microsoft and the Office logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries.