Or does human idiocy have no end?
Isn't it a fact that presentations are getting more and more important in the world of business communications? And the quantity of presentations taking place worldwide every day is probably innumerable. At the same time, following this trend, we do see a multiplication of tools available to facilitate presenters' lives. Oddly, the most common of these tools, being by far the most efficient, is also the most unjustifiably and dumbly criticized: PowerPoint!
Ever since the visual communication "expert", Edward Tufte growled the most unreasonable of (pre)concepts ever raised against a tool (death by PowerPoint), waves of bleats from herds of followers against the "evils" of PowerPoint seem to have no end at sight!
From NASA’s accusation of guilt for the Columbia space shuttle accident in August 2003 to the responsibility for the unsuccessful military interventions in Afghanistan pointed by US generals in 2010 and even the birth of the ridiculous Swiss Anti PowerPoint Party, reactions to PowerPoint have often been absurd.
If that was not enough, early last month we watched top General Motors executives blaming PowerPoint for the changes in their company's corporate culture, which resulted in its recent declaration of bankruptcy.
Has it ever occurred to anyone in their right mind to blame a bad speech on the pencil or the paper used in its writing? Tools aren't to be blamed for its bad use, users are! A hammer and a chisel, by themselves don't make anyone a mason or a sculptor, but these same tools in the right hands, helped Michelangelo create Pietà for the world!
Just like a hammer and a chisel, PowerPoint is only a tool, a great tool indeed, but not a magic wand which does all the job by itself -- and thus may be held accountable for the end results. Due to such apparent easiness and accessibility, less attentive users have flooded the world of slides with more than doubtful presentations.
Companies, managers and other responsible professionals invest lots of time and resources, both human and financial, in the development of projects and products. When required to invest time in the fields of communication, marketing and advertising, they don't create their content in-house, but they call upon experts such as communication and/or advertising agencies.
Oddly, very often risking those same investments, many of them act differently for a presentation! Why are they devaluing a pivotal point in any project - its presentation - to stockholders, investors, media, etc. in such a way?
What if only, due to savings, laziness, or even pure bad management, results end up going down the drain? Then, as in the cases cited above, they'll point fingers to the tool they used so irresponsibly? And that tool, more often than not happens to be PowerPoint.
The fact is that, for those slide moments, there are also experts including presentation designers and professionals who work the contents of their clients' presentations into more efficient pieces of communication, not just "prettier" ones.
Contrary to perception, it's important to understand that design is not mere decoration. Design means development, shaping and optimization of a function and, as in everything else design makes the difference in presentations!
This text reflects only the personal opinions of someone who's been a presentation designer for the last 30 years. To those who deem this class inconsistent, I hope to have, at least helped to arouse reflection, to those who deem them unreasonable. Never mind...I can always blame Microsoft Word for my words!
Miguel Monteiro is Owner & Master Designer at TRIBE Presentations (Portugal). Miguel has been a graphic designer/illustrator, working in Advertising and Communication Design since 1978 and developing computer based multimedia presentations since 1988, for many high end clients. Currently, Miguel focusses on creative consultancy and project development in business multimedia presentations design, video & audio production, event and scene design, exhibitions, etc.
See Also: TRIBE Presentations: Conversation with Miguel Monteiro
Categories: guest_post, opinion, powerpoint
April 2003 | May 2003 | December 2003 | January 2004 | February 2004 | March 2004 | April 2004 | May 2004 | June 2004 | July 2004 | August 2004 | September 2004 | October 2004 | November 2004 | December 2004 | January 2005 | February 2005 | March 2005 | April 2005 | May 2005 | June 2005 | July 2005 | August 2005 | September 2005 | October 2005 | November 2005 | December 2005 | January 2006 | February 2006 | March 2006 | April 2006 | May 2006 | June 2006 | July 2006 | August 2006 | September 2006 | October 2006 | November 2006 | December 2006 | January 2007 | February 2007 | March 2007 | April 2007 | May 2007 | June 2007 | July 2007 | August 2007 | September 2007 | October 2007 | November 2007 | December 2007 | January 2008 | February 2008 | March 2008 | April 2008 | May 2008 | June 2008 | July 2008 | August 2008 | September 2008 | October 2008 | November 2008 | December 2008 | January 2009 | February 2009 | March 2009 | April 2009 | May 2009 | June 2009 | July 2009 | August 2009 | September 2009 | October 2009 | November 2009 | December 2009 | January 2010 | February 2010 | March 2010 | April 2010 | May 2010 | June 2010 | July 2010 | August 2010 | September 2010 | October 2010 | November 2010 | December 2010 | January 2011 | February 2011 | March 2011 | April 2011 | May 2011 | June 2011 | July 2011 | August 2011 | September 2011 | October 2011 | November 2011 | December 2011 | January 2012 | February 2012 | March 2012 | April 2012 | May 2012 | June 2012 | July 2012 | August 2012 | September 2012 | October 2012 | November 2012 | December 2012 | January 2013 | February 2013 | March 2013 | April 2013 | May 2013 | June 2013 | July 2013 | August 2013 | September 2013 | October 2013 | November 2013 | December 2013 | January 2014 | February 2014 | March 2014 | April 2014 | May 2014 | June 2014 | July 2014 | August 2014 | September 2014 | October 2014 | November 2014 | December 2014 | January 2015 | February 2015 | March 2015 | April 2015 | May 2015 | June 2015 | July 2015 | August 2015 | September 2015 | October 2015 | November 2015 | December 2015 | January 2016 | February 2016 | March 2016 | April 2016 | May 2016 | June 2016 | July 2016 | August 2016 | September 2016 | October 2016 | November 2016 | December 2016 | January 2017 | February 2017 | March 2017 |
Microsoft and the Office logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries.