Patrick (Pat) Speer has been working in the Computer Industry since 1975. He received his B.S. degree in Physics from The Ohio State University with a focus on computational physics. His extensive software experience includes architecture, project management, and software systems analysis, design, implementation, and training. Pat serves as CTO and senior technical consultant for developersDen, providing direction in business analysis, and solution architecture and design for their product development efforts.
In this conversation, Patrick discusses DynaPoint, an add-in for PowerPoint.
Geetesh: Tell us more about DynaPoint – what it does and why you created it.
Patrick: Our team spent a number of years working with Office Automation. During that time we were fortunate to have the opportunity to work intimately with PowerPoint and gain a high-level of expertise with its programming model. As we used the product, and its many features, we began to evaluate the approach taken by Microsoft with the user experience related to these features. One valuable capability that we took a close look at was that of slide reuse. We realized that many PowerPoint users were not even aware of this capability and that fact coupled with some of the requirements that Microsoft levied on the technology, made the feature difficult to use, inflexible, and for some functionality, unattainable. Thus was born, DynaPoint.
DynaPoint is a PowerPoint add-in that allows for simplified browsing of local drives, mapped drives, network shares, and even FTP sites, for PowerPoint presentations and the ability to preview the slides within them, without actually opening them within PowerPoint.
We decided that the browsing capability should be available to all PowerPoint users at no extra charge. For a small registration fee (introductory price of $29.95), the user gains additional functionality which includes the ability to incorporate existing slides into new presentations. Slides can be included as static embedded slides or dynamic linked slides. Embedded slides retain their existing content, while dynamic slides are updated to reflect the current content of their source, each time the show is opened, or on demand.
As mentioned previously, the source location for including slides is very flexible and never requires the use of SharePoint Slide Libraries.
Geetesh: How is using DynaPoint different than using SharePoint's Slide Libraries?
Patrick: Well, to tell the truth, we are not trying to replace any existing PowerPoint functionality, but rather enhance it. While we felt that embedded slides are certainly useful, the true power of slide reuse is realized by dynamic linking. When you think about business or education where regularly scheduled presentations are commonplace, such as in status meetings, budget meetings, etc. and while the focus of the presentation is fairly static, but the content needs to be current, dynamic slides can save countless hours of effort. PowerPoint has the native ability to leverage SharePoint Slide Libraries to accomplish this type of behavior.
Our concern with Microsoft's approach, was that the dependency on SharePoint alone to provide users with this capability was extremely limiting. First of all, not everyone uses SharePoint, which has a fairly high cost of ownership. Secondly, even if SharePoint is available, forcing users to use SharePoint Slide Libraries to gain dynamic content capabilities ignores the many other storage facilities, such as mapped drives, file shares and FTP sites, or other cloud-based storage options.
With DynaPoint, users are free to continue to use the slide capabilities that PowerPoint provides "out of the box", and incorporate the additional functionality, flexibility and intuitive interface of DynaPoint. Of course everyone can make use of the DynaPoint Browser functionality, whether or not they choose to license the full product.
Categories: add-in, interviews, powerpoint
Looks very interesting Geetesh & Patrick and something many have tried to address in the past, with varying degrees of success. This looks like it could be the most successful to date! I've already recommended to a client of ours and will share on our GMARK social channels.
GMARK PowerPoint, thank you very much for your comments, they are much appreciated. We have tried to make DynaPoint an affordable yet highly effective capability for all PowerPoint users. We will continue to add features and refine the product, based on our experience, as well as the feedback of our user base. I look forward to communicating with you in the future!
April 2003 | May 2003 | December 2003 | January 2004 | February 2004 | March 2004 | April 2004 | May 2004 | June 2004 | July 2004 | August 2004 | September 2004 | October 2004 | November 2004 | December 2004 | January 2005 | February 2005 | March 2005 | April 2005 | May 2005 | June 2005 | July 2005 | August 2005 | September 2005 | October 2005 | November 2005 | December 2005 | January 2006 | February 2006 | March 2006 | April 2006 | May 2006 | June 2006 | July 2006 | August 2006 | September 2006 | October 2006 | November 2006 | December 2006 | January 2007 | February 2007 | March 2007 | April 2007 | May 2007 | June 2007 | July 2007 | August 2007 | September 2007 | October 2007 | November 2007 | December 2007 | January 2008 | February 2008 | March 2008 | April 2008 | May 2008 | June 2008 | July 2008 | August 2008 | September 2008 | October 2008 | November 2008 | December 2008 | January 2009 | February 2009 | March 2009 | April 2009 | May 2009 | June 2009 | July 2009 | August 2009 | September 2009 | October 2009 | November 2009 | December 2009 | January 2010 | February 2010 | March 2010 | April 2010 | May 2010 | June 2010 | July 2010 | August 2010 | September 2010 | October 2010 | November 2010 | December 2010 | January 2011 | February 2011 | March 2011 | April 2011 | May 2011 | June 2011 | July 2011 | August 2011 | September 2011 | October 2011 | November 2011 | December 2011 | January 2012 | February 2012 | March 2012 | April 2012 | May 2012 | June 2012 | July 2012 | August 2012 | September 2012 | October 2012 | November 2012 | December 2012 | January 2013 | February 2013 | March 2013 | April 2013 | May 2013 | June 2013 | July 2013 | August 2013 | September 2013 | October 2013 | November 2013 | December 2013 | January 2014 | February 2014 | March 2014 | April 2014 | May 2014 | June 2014 | July 2014 | August 2014 | September 2014 | October 2014 | November 2014 | December 2014 | January 2015 | February 2015 | March 2015 | April 2015 | May 2015 | June 2015 | July 2015 | August 2015 | September 2015 | October 2015 | November 2015 | December 2015 | January 2016 | February 2016 | March 2016 | April 2016 | May 2016 | June 2016 | July 2016 | August 2016 | September 2016 | October 2016 | November 2016 | December 2016 | January 2017 | February 2017 |
Microsoft and the Office logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries.