Dr. Andrew Abela is the Dean of the School of Business & Economics at the Catholic University of America in Washington, DC. In addition to co-authoring The Encyclopedia of Slide Layouts, with Paul Radich, he has written Advanced Presentations by Design, currently in its second edition, The Presentation: A Story About Successful Communication with Very Few Slides, and co-edited A Catechism for Business, with Dr. Joe Capizzi. His academic research has been published in the Journal of Marketing, the Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, the Journal of Business Ethics, and several other journals. He provides consulting and training to major global corporations, including JPMorganChase and Microsoft.
In this conversation, Andrew discusses his new book, The Encyclopedia of Slide Layouts.
Geetesh: Your new book, The Encyclopedia of Slide Layouts is a comprehensive resource, but it is also a reference to explore that will help create better slides. This is not something that you can write in a moderate amount of time -- so what prompted you to take up such a huge challenge?
Andrew: The Extreme Presentation workshop, which both Paul (Radich, my coauthor) and I teach, always receives strongly positive reviews whenever we deliver it. But there was one question that did come up often. In the workshop we draw a distinction between what we call "Ballroom Style" presentations, with pictures and very few words, and "Conference Room Style" presentations, which are more graphical but have a lot more detail on them. We make a very strong case that when you're trying to sell an idea or product, or persuade someone, then a Conference Room Style presentation is more effective. Participants agree, but then they ask us for more examples of Conference Room Style presentations - which is why we came up with the idea of the book.
Frankly, if someone had told us that it would take us five years to gather all the examples in the book, and collect all the necessary permissions to publish them, we might not have been so enthusiastic...! But we're glad we did it.
Geetesh: For all layouts that you explain, you also provide links to resources through which readers can get a ready-to-use sample that they can use as a starting point. Tell us about this feature and other interesting nuances – or you can share a behind-the-scenes anecdote?
Andrew: Yes, we wanted to make it easy for readers to create slides like the ones we profile in the book, so each chapter contains recommended sources for free and subscription sources of slide templates. One of our readers then wrote to us and said "couldn't you make all those links available electronically?" So we created the "electronic slide chooser" in Prezi:
What people tell us about the book is that it's great for flipping through to get good ideas for how to lay out a slide so that it passes the "squint test" (the layout of the slide reinforces the main message of the slide, so that your audience immediately grasps the main message). Slide layout is your single most powerful design feature, but most people ignore it, using instead an undifferentiated list of bullets.
See Also: Advanced Presentations by Design: An Interview with Dr. Andrew Abela | The Encyclopedia of Slide Layouts: Conversation with Paul J. Radich
Categories: books, design, interviews, powerpoint
April 2003 | May 2003 | December 2003 | January 2004 | February 2004 | March 2004 | April 2004 | May 2004 | June 2004 | July 2004 | August 2004 | September 2004 | October 2004 | November 2004 | December 2004 | January 2005 | February 2005 | March 2005 | April 2005 | May 2005 | June 2005 | July 2005 | August 2005 | September 2005 | October 2005 | November 2005 | December 2005 | January 2006 | February 2006 | March 2006 | April 2006 | May 2006 | June 2006 | July 2006 | August 2006 | September 2006 | October 2006 | November 2006 | December 2006 | January 2007 | February 2007 | March 2007 | April 2007 | May 2007 | June 2007 | July 2007 | August 2007 | September 2007 | October 2007 | November 2007 | December 2007 | January 2008 | February 2008 | March 2008 | April 2008 | May 2008 | June 2008 | July 2008 | August 2008 | September 2008 | October 2008 | November 2008 | December 2008 | January 2009 | February 2009 | March 2009 | April 2009 | May 2009 | June 2009 | July 2009 | August 2009 | September 2009 | October 2009 | November 2009 | December 2009 | January 2010 | February 2010 | March 2010 | April 2010 | May 2010 | June 2010 | July 2010 | August 2010 | September 2010 | October 2010 | November 2010 | December 2010 | January 2011 | February 2011 | March 2011 | April 2011 | May 2011 | June 2011 | July 2011 | August 2011 | September 2011 | October 2011 | November 2011 | December 2011 | January 2012 | February 2012 | March 2012 | April 2012 | May 2012 | June 2012 | July 2012 | August 2012 | September 2012 | October 2012 | November 2012 | December 2012 | January 2013 | February 2013 | March 2013 | April 2013 | May 2013 | June 2013 | July 2013 | August 2013 | September 2013 | October 2013 | November 2013 | December 2013 | January 2014 | February 2014 | March 2014 | April 2014 | May 2014 | June 2014 | July 2014 | August 2014 | September 2014 | October 2014 | November 2014 | December 2014 | January 2015 | February 2015 | March 2015 | April 2015 | May 2015 | June 2015 | July 2015 | August 2015 | September 2015 | October 2015 | November 2015 | December 2015 | January 2016 | February 2016 | March 2016 | April 2016 | May 2016 | June 2016 | July 2016 | August 2016 | September 2016 | October 2016 |
Microsoft and the Office logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries.