Simon Raybould is a speaker and trainer. As a speaker, he specializes in resilience, emotional robustness, public speaking and presenting. As a trainer, he is the director of the training company Aware Plus. He has a particular speciality as a trainer and coach helping anyone who wants to make better use of their voice or who wants (needs?) to make better presentations. Basically, as he says, "it all boils down to 'impact'". His clients range from start-ups to multi-nationals such as Dell Computers and football teams in the English Premiership!
In this conversation, Simon discusses his new book, Presentation Genius.
Geetesh: Tell us more about why you wrote your book, Presentation Genius and what's the special takeaway for any reader?
Simon:Presentation Genius sits on the borderline between entertainment and research -- there's almost no "opinion" in it -- and that makes it special. I've read nearly 400 research papers from all kinds of backgrounds and areas, and 'translated' them into easily-understood English. What's special is that it's a book based on science.
Far, far too often books about presenting are based on what works in the author's experience. I'm not saying they're bad books, but what works well for one person, in one set of circumstances, with a specific personality is not necessarily what's the best thing for a different person in different situations, with a different personality. What this book does (like our training!) is get beyond just my opinion and look at the scientific principles in question, so that people can see why some things work and then figure out how to apply them in their own circumstances.
Can I give you an example that I heard only last week? In fact, I hear it over and over again -- that presenters should get out and about to greet their audience before the presentation starts. There are two things wrong with that advice, potentially. The first is the obvious one that it's simply not possible for a lot of presenters, logistically, and if you're a novice presenter, not being able to do what you're told you 'should' do can cause some angst.
But more subtly, some people are introverts. Doing a happy-clappy meet-and-greet will simply stress them, put them off their work (and possibly do the same to their audience), and therefore make them more likely to make a mistake. Sure, there are some positives, such as being able (occasionally) to pick up ways of customising the presentation, but for introverts the costs can far, far outway the benefits.
So why has this idea become such a popular piece of received wisdom for speakers and presenters? Perhaps firstly because it can make some kind of instinctive, intuitive sense at the superficial level but also because a lot of presenters are extroverts... and they don't have the training to understand that not everyone is like them! They simply assume that everyone is like them, and give blanket-advice... despite it being ill-advised for about half the population!
Presentation Genius is something of an antidote to things like that -- where people are sharing information without checking how useful or how accurate it is! To be honest, this approach probably comes from my background as a research scientist. I worked in universities as a research for 24 years before I became a trainer and author. The result is that everything we cover in our training and everything I cover in the book is validated with hardcore research references.
I'd like to think it reads easily though. After all, if I can't write in a reasonable style I'd be something of a hypocrite! :)
April 2003 | May 2003 | December 2003 | January 2004 | February 2004 | March 2004 | April 2004 | May 2004 | June 2004 | July 2004 | August 2004 | September 2004 | October 2004 | November 2004 | December 2004 | January 2005 | February 2005 | March 2005 | April 2005 | May 2005 | June 2005 | July 2005 | August 2005 | September 2005 | October 2005 | November 2005 | December 2005 | January 2006 | February 2006 | March 2006 | April 2006 | May 2006 | June 2006 | July 2006 | August 2006 | September 2006 | October 2006 | November 2006 | December 2006 | January 2007 | February 2007 | March 2007 | April 2007 | May 2007 | June 2007 | July 2007 | August 2007 | September 2007 | October 2007 | November 2007 | December 2007 | January 2008 | February 2008 | March 2008 | April 2008 | May 2008 | June 2008 | July 2008 | August 2008 | September 2008 | October 2008 | November 2008 | December 2008 | January 2009 | February 2009 | March 2009 | April 2009 | May 2009 | June 2009 | July 2009 | August 2009 | September 2009 | October 2009 | November 2009 | December 2009 | January 2010 | February 2010 | March 2010 | April 2010 | May 2010 | June 2010 | July 2010 | August 2010 | September 2010 | October 2010 | November 2010 | December 2010 | January 2011 | February 2011 | March 2011 | April 2011 | May 2011 | June 2011 | July 2011 | August 2011 | September 2011 | October 2011 | November 2011 | December 2011 | January 2012 | February 2012 | March 2012 | April 2012 | May 2012 | June 2012 | July 2012 | August 2012 | September 2012 | October 2012 | November 2012 | December 2012 | January 2013 | February 2013 | March 2013 | April 2013 | May 2013 | June 2013 | July 2013 | August 2013 | September 2013 | October 2013 | November 2013 | December 2013 | January 2014 | February 2014 | March 2014 | April 2014 | May 2014 | June 2014 | July 2014 | August 2014 | September 2014 | October 2014 | November 2014 | December 2014 | January 2015 | February 2015 | March 2015 | April 2015 | May 2015 | June 2015 | July 2015 | August 2015 | September 2015 | October 2015 | November 2015 | December 2015 | January 2016 | February 2016 | March 2016 | April 2016 | May 2016 | June 2016 | July 2016 | August 2016 | September 2016 | October 2016 | November 2016 | December 2016 | January 2017 | February 2017 | March 2017 |
Microsoft and the Office logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries.