Dave Howell is the founder of Avatron Software, the mobile app developer that created Air Sharing, Print Sharing, and Air Display. Before starting Avatron, Dave was a senior engineering manager at Apple, where he worked on the Pro Apps and Productivity Apps teams. Dave has Computer Science and Music degrees from Case Western Reserve University and a Cornell MBA.
In this conversation, Dave discusses using their Air Display product to use an iPad as a presenting tool.
Geetesh: Tell us about Air Display – how did you conceptualize and evolve this product?
Dave: We made Air Display for ourselves. We are all big multi-monitor users here. We typically have a couple of 27 or 30-inch displays on our desks. But we also use laptops, and are routinely frustrated by the ridiculously tiny screens on them, especially on the 11" MacBook Air, an otherwise fantastic machine. There's just not enough screen real estate to work effectively. So when the iPad was announced and we got our hands on the updated SDK, we decided to experiment at writing virtual video drivers for the Mac and sending the pixels over to the iPad.
At first it was pretty slow but we devised a proprietary video codec that dynamically changes compression quality depending on what's happening onscreen. We paid particular attention to optimizing perceived performance, which requires tracking mouse movements without a noticeable lag. We managed to achieve that on all but the noisiest WiFi networks. As soon as the Mac version was in QA, we started on the Windows drivers, and delivered that soon thereafter.
Originally all of this was in the hands of one senior engineer, while the rest of the team focused on our Air Sharing app and other projects. Now we have different engineers working on different pieces of Air Display, including quite a bit of shared technology that is used by multiple apps. One engineer is working on network communication protocols, another on Mac components, another on Windows ports, another on the Windows drivers, one on Android ports... and so on. With greater focus we're seeing greater productivity. Most engineers need to take ownership of some body of code in order to have the freedom to build and remold it optimally, and in order to feel motivated and challenged.
At this point, Air Display pretty much does what we want it to do. We're focusing our development efforts less on features and more quality: optimizing frame rates and image quality, improving robustness on flaky networks, compatibility with new operating system releases, ports to other platforms, and so on.
Geetesh: Do you get surprised hearing about how people use this product in a way that you did not imagine then?
Dave: All the time! People never use software of any complexity the way you expect. And our apps, including Air Sharing as well as Air Display, afford a wide range of different uses. Air Sharing in particular is something of a Swiss Army knife.
We've heard from dentists and physicians who use Air Display to provide a wireless monitor for things like dental cameras and endoscopes. They hand an iPad to a family member during a procedure or show something to a patient on an iPod touch.
There are some musicians who use the touch surface to control soft mixing boards or virtual instruments. Photographers take an iPad onto a photo set to preview a picture while adjusting subjects or lighting. A number of flight simulator users are using Air Display for some auxiliary control panels. There's a great YouTube video demonstrating the use of Air Display to control theatrical stage lighting. Programmers put debugger windows on the extra screen. And office users will drag some app window onto the Air Display screen and take their iPad over to a colleague's office to demonstrate something.
And of course there are the users who just geek out at having a sixth monitor or at putting a chat window on a little iPod touch screen.
Finally, a customer just contacted us this morning saying he was deploying iPads in pizza restaurants for online order taking systems. I hadn't seen that one coming.
Geetesh: Your Air Display product has thousands of usage scenarios, but for presenters it lets them use the iPad along with a live PowerPoint or Keynote presentation to navigate between slides, look at notes, and more. How important is this feature for you, and can you share some feedback about this feature that you have heard from users?
Dave: It's interesting. We really envisioned Air Display being most useful for extending a small desktop onto two screens. But we're seeing a lot of people use Air Display in mirroring mode for presentations. There are a few different common presentation use cases.
One field sales guy meets a client at a coffee shop, runs Air Display to mirror his PC to his iPad, and hands the iPad to the client. We have a setting in Air Display to disable touch interaction, so in this case the client can't tap the screen to interfere with his presentation. The result is a very personal presentation without the distraction of crowding around a laptop. Another user, an accountant, reports meeting clients in coffee shops, mounting the iPad behind his laptop facing away from her so that the client can watch what she's doing from the other side of a table. Then she goes through spreadsheets and charts in Excel to explain.
iPad Presenting 01: First Questions First
iPad Presenting 02 -- Presenter’s View in PowerPoint: Conversation with Rikk Flohr
Categories: interviews, ipad, keynote, powerpoint, presentation_skills
Thanks for Air Display. I am going to buy the app to use with my iPad and Macbook Pro for presentations.
April 2003 | May 2003 | December 2003 | January 2004 | February 2004 | March 2004 | April 2004 | May 2004 | June 2004 | July 2004 | August 2004 | September 2004 | October 2004 | November 2004 | December 2004 | January 2005 | February 2005 | March 2005 | April 2005 | May 2005 | June 2005 | July 2005 | August 2005 | September 2005 | October 2005 | November 2005 | December 2005 | January 2006 | February 2006 | March 2006 | April 2006 | May 2006 | June 2006 | July 2006 | August 2006 | September 2006 | October 2006 | November 2006 | December 2006 | January 2007 | February 2007 | March 2007 | April 2007 | May 2007 | June 2007 | July 2007 | August 2007 | September 2007 | October 2007 | November 2007 | December 2007 | January 2008 | February 2008 | March 2008 | April 2008 | May 2008 | June 2008 | July 2008 | August 2008 | September 2008 | October 2008 | November 2008 | December 2008 | January 2009 | February 2009 | March 2009 | April 2009 | May 2009 | June 2009 | July 2009 | August 2009 | September 2009 | October 2009 | November 2009 | December 2009 | January 2010 | February 2010 | March 2010 | April 2010 | May 2010 | June 2010 | July 2010 | August 2010 | September 2010 | October 2010 | November 2010 | December 2010 | January 2011 | February 2011 | March 2011 | April 2011 | May 2011 | June 2011 | July 2011 | August 2011 | September 2011 | October 2011 | November 2011 | December 2011 | January 2012 | February 2012 | March 2012 | April 2012 | May 2012 | June 2012 | July 2012 | August 2012 | September 2012 | October 2012 | November 2012 | December 2012 | January 2013 | February 2013 | March 2013 | April 2013 | May 2013 | June 2013 | July 2013 | August 2013 | September 2013 | October 2013 | November 2013 | December 2013 | January 2014 | February 2014 | March 2014 | April 2014 | May 2014 | June 2014 | July 2014 | August 2014 | September 2014 | October 2014 | November 2014 | December 2014 | January 2015 | February 2015 | March 2015 | April 2015 | May 2015 | June 2015 | July 2015 | August 2015 | September 2015 | October 2015 | November 2015 | December 2015 | January 2016 | February 2016 | March 2016 | April 2016 | May 2016 | June 2016 | July 2016 | August 2016 | September 2016 | October 2016 | November 2016 | December 2016 | January 2017 | February 2017 | March 2017 |
Microsoft and the Office logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries.