Damith C. Rajapakse is a faculty member at the School of Computing, National University of Singapore. He has a deep interest, and many years of experience, in presentation design and the craft of software building. He is the project mentor for the PowerPointLabs project and other similar efforts.
In this conversation, Damith discusses the Animate in Slide options the currently free PowerPointLabs add-in for PowerPoint.
Geetesh: Your Animate in Slide option does something that was very painstakingly slow in just an instant – can you explain this feature and what motivated you to automate this?
Damith: When presenting a detailed slide, moving a shape (e.g. an arrow) around the slide in multiple steps can help the audience follow your explanations. Here are some examples:
As you pointed out, creating such an animation used to be a painstakingly slow process. We thought it was time we did something about it. With the PowerPointLab's Animate in Slide feature, all one has to do it is select the shapes and click a button. It takes just a few seconds only and the results are always perfect, which was not the case when using the traditional method.
Geetesh: Animation does receive a lot of criticism and people complain that it often distracts the audience rather than holding their attention. However, there's a purpose behind animation – how much animation is sufficient and when do you know that you have crossed the limit?
Damith: We are here because our ancestors were good at detecting movements, which helped them to detect dangers quicker, which in turn helped them survive longer so that they could pass down their genes. That is why we are hardwired to pay attention to moving things, so much so that we cannot ignore movements even if we wanted to. It is in our genes. That is also why animation can enhance or ruin the audience' experience, depending on how it is used in a presentation. For example, animation is a great tool for catching and directing audience attention (as in the example animations above), but when used excessively, it becomes a distraction. When used for directing attention, it should last no longer than it is enough to catch the eye of the audience.
In addition, we can use animations to convey meaning. For example, the animation below (also created using PowerPointLabs) shows how a bad cell embeds itself among good cells, which may be easier to understand when animated like this than when showing a static diagram only. When using animations to convey meaning, we should still make it as short as possible, and strictly use only animations that convey the right meaning. An animation that neither directs attention nor conveys meaning has no place in a presentation.
Categories: add-in, animation, interviews, powerpoint
April 2003 | May 2003 | December 2003 | January 2004 | February 2004 | March 2004 | April 2004 | May 2004 | June 2004 | July 2004 | August 2004 | September 2004 | October 2004 | November 2004 | December 2004 | January 2005 | February 2005 | March 2005 | April 2005 | May 2005 | June 2005 | July 2005 | August 2005 | September 2005 | October 2005 | November 2005 | December 2005 | January 2006 | February 2006 | March 2006 | April 2006 | May 2006 | June 2006 | July 2006 | August 2006 | September 2006 | October 2006 | November 2006 | December 2006 | January 2007 | February 2007 | March 2007 | April 2007 | May 2007 | June 2007 | July 2007 | August 2007 | September 2007 | October 2007 | November 2007 | December 2007 | January 2008 | February 2008 | March 2008 | April 2008 | May 2008 | June 2008 | July 2008 | August 2008 | September 2008 | October 2008 | November 2008 | December 2008 | January 2009 | February 2009 | March 2009 | April 2009 | May 2009 | June 2009 | July 2009 | August 2009 | September 2009 | October 2009 | November 2009 | December 2009 | January 2010 | February 2010 | March 2010 | April 2010 | May 2010 | June 2010 | July 2010 | August 2010 | September 2010 | October 2010 | November 2010 | December 2010 | January 2011 | February 2011 | March 2011 | April 2011 | May 2011 | June 2011 | July 2011 | August 2011 | September 2011 | October 2011 | November 2011 | December 2011 | January 2012 | February 2012 | March 2012 | April 2012 | May 2012 | June 2012 | July 2012 | August 2012 | September 2012 | October 2012 | November 2012 | December 2012 | January 2013 | February 2013 | March 2013 | April 2013 | May 2013 | June 2013 | July 2013 | August 2013 | September 2013 | October 2013 | November 2013 | December 2013 | January 2014 | February 2014 | March 2014 | April 2014 | May 2014 | June 2014 | July 2014 | August 2014 | September 2014 | October 2014 | November 2014 | December 2014 | January 2015 | February 2015 | March 2015 | April 2015 | May 2015 | June 2015 | July 2015 | August 2015 | September 2015 | October 2015 | November 2015 | December 2015 | January 2016 | February 2016 | March 2016 | April 2016 | May 2016 | June 2016 | July 2016 | August 2016 | September 2016 | October 2016 |
Microsoft and the Office logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries.