Tucker Hatfield has been working as a Program Manager at Microsoft for 18 years and the last ten of them have been in Office. He’s worked on Cropping, Background Removal, Artistic Effects, Co-authoring, and Comments. He’s currently working primarily on Pen and Ink improvements for Office, including the recent Ink Editor feature. When work and family allows, he indulges his love for photography and is trying to teach himself ukulele.
In this conversation, Tucker explores the Background Removal in PowerPoint.
Geetesh: Tucker, you have been involved with the amazing Background Removal options in PowerPoint. What prompted you to add this feature?
Tucker: Background Removal was a lucky synergy between Microsoft Research (MSR) and the Office Graphics team.
As digital cameras and smartphones were beginning to make use of images in Office documents more common, we began to get feedback from customers that they needed to do simple photo editing without having to invest in expensive editing software or involve an artist. During planning for Office 14 (Office 2010), we decided we needed to improve our support for pictures in the core applications to address those needs. As a result, we made improving picture editing a priority and began planning.
At the same time we were planning, MSR was also investigating ways to improve the picture editing experience. During our research, we found an internal website from MSR Cambridge showing images of a program they were calling “Grabcut” that could isolate parts of a picture and let you remove the background. It included some demo videos that were short but impressive and we contacted them to find out how long it might be before that technology was available.
To our surprise, they responded by sending back a demo app that actually worked. It had a very minimal user interface and a required a little finesse to use, but it worked quite well, so we started deeper discussions about how to get it into Office. Integrating Grabcut involved a lot of work to make it compatible with Office code, our rendering system, and our user interface, but MSR helped us every step of the way. In fact, our team received a Technology Transfer Award from Microsoft Research for our collaboration.
We shipped it in Office 2010, along with other picture editing features. During Office 2013 (Office 15) development, our India Development Center took over developing picture features and have made further improvements.
Geetesh: Have you been surprised by ways in which the Background Removal tool has been used—in other words, have you seen Background Removal being used in ways never imagined before? Alternatively, do you want to share a story or some trivia about the Background Removal tool?
Tucker: It’s been amusing to see how much we use Background Removal ourselves. We do a lot of decks and specification documents where product shots, images of a user interface, or logos need to be used and we use Background Removal so that the image “floats” instead of having a rectangular border and a bland background. It also gets used a lot to remove parts of the image that we don’t want to show or to isolate an objects or UI so that it’s the focus of the discussion. Seeing it used so frequently in work documents is very cool.
But I’d have to say that the most impressive use I’ve seen background removal put to was shown to me by one of the people who make decks for some of Microsoft’s major presentations. It’s a process where they take a single picture, remove specific background elements of it, and then “layer” it on top of itself. The result is that you can have objects look like they’re behind one element of the image and in front of another. You can even animate the shapes.
In the example I was first shown, the author used an animated icon of a skier skiing between background-removed layers of mountains. You can also animate layers moving horizontally at slightly different speeds to give a “Ken Burns” style pan of a static image. I’ve used these stacked images a lot since discovering the technique – it can add a lot of interest to an otherwise static picture.
As an example, I can take three versions of a mountain landscape: one complete, one with just the sky removed, and one with the sky and mountains removed. I then stack them so that they align and look like the original, but by adding in shapes at various Z-orders in the stack of images, I can create a 3D effect.
The Selection Pane helps a lot in ordering them correctly and since pictures “snap” in alignment, it’s easy to realign the separate images.
Geetesh: Thank you so much for sharing some amazing thoughts in this feature, Tucker. Many Indezine readers will find inspiration from the Background Layers trick! I look forward to interviewing you again.
See Also: PowerPoint Feedback and UserVoice: Does This Go Anywhere?
April 2003 | May 2003 | December 2003 | January 2004 | February 2004 | March 2004 | April 2004 | May 2004 | June 2004 | July 2004 | August 2004 | September 2004 | October 2004 | November 2004 | December 2004 | January 2005 | February 2005 | March 2005 | April 2005 | May 2005 | June 2005 | July 2005 | August 2005 | September 2005 | October 2005 | November 2005 | December 2005 | January 2006 | February 2006 | March 2006 | April 2006 | May 2006 | June 2006 | July 2006 | August 2006 | September 2006 | October 2006 | November 2006 | December 2006 | January 2007 | February 2007 | March 2007 | April 2007 | May 2007 | June 2007 | July 2007 | August 2007 | September 2007 | October 2007 | November 2007 | December 2007 | January 2008 | February 2008 | March 2008 | April 2008 | May 2008 | June 2008 | July 2008 | August 2008 | September 2008 | October 2008 | November 2008 | December 2008 | January 2009 | February 2009 | March 2009 | April 2009 | May 2009 | June 2009 | July 2009 | August 2009 | September 2009 | October 2009 | November 2009 | December 2009 | January 2010 | February 2010 | March 2010 | April 2010 | May 2010 | June 2010 | July 2010 | August 2010 | September 2010 | October 2010 | November 2010 | December 2010 | January 2011 | February 2011 | March 2011 | April 2011 | May 2011 | June 2011 | July 2011 | August 2011 | September 2011 | October 2011 | November 2011 | December 2011 | January 2012 | February 2012 | March 2012 | April 2012 | May 2012 | June 2012 | July 2012 | August 2012 | September 2012 | October 2012 | November 2012 | December 2012 | January 2013 | February 2013 | March 2013 | April 2013 | May 2013 | June 2013 | July 2013 | August 2013 | September 2013 | October 2013 | November 2013 | December 2013 | January 2014 | February 2014 | March 2014 | April 2014 | May 2014 | June 2014 | July 2014 | August 2014 | September 2014 | October 2014 | November 2014 | December 2014 | January 2015 | February 2015 | March 2015 | April 2015 | May 2015 | June 2015 | July 2015 | August 2015 | September 2015 | October 2015 | November 2015 | December 2015 | January 2016 | February 2016 | March 2016 | April 2016 | May 2016 | June 2016 | July 2016 | August 2016 | September 2016 | October 2016 | November 2016 | December 2016 | January 2017 | February 2017 |
Microsoft and the Office logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries.