Carmen Simon is a cognitive neuroscientist, bestselling author, and leading expert on using memory to influence decision-making. Her most recent book, Impossible to Ignore: Create Memorable Content to Influence Decisions, has won the acclaim of publications such as Inc.com, Forbes, and Fast Company, and has been selected as one of the top ten books of the year. Simon speaks frequently to industry, academic, and government audiences on neuroscience research findings related to the future of the human brain against the background of automation. She has over 20 years of experience in the fields of computer interface design, and multimedia, and holds doctorates in both instructional technology and cognitive psychology.
In this conversation, Carmen discusses her keynote at the upcoming Presentation Summit 2016 series.
Geetesh: You are presenting the keynote on Wednesday called Again: How to repeat responsibly. Give us a curtain-raiser introduction to your session and what you believe the attendee will take away from your talk?
Carmen: I am excited about my presentation because it resolves the tension that often occurs in presenters’ minds: we know that repetition leads to memory, but we also know that repetition can turn to annoyance very quickly. How often can you say, “buy this product” or “believe in this idea” without sounding like a parrot and getting on people’s nerves?
Ironically, after viewing hundreds of presentations each quarter, I am noticing that the problem in business is not too much repetition, it is not enough repetition. Paired with that is also the problem of inconsistent repetition or repetition of a message without a reward. When supporters of the exit plan for England wanted to be on people’s minds, they repeated the “Take Back Control” mantra constantly. One of the main reasons it was successful was because it followed the formula: repetition + reward.
Overall, after attending the keynote, participants will take away practical techniques for addressing questions such as why repeat a message, how to repeat a message (and how often), and when is an optimal time to repeat so the brain remembers. And all of this only matters because customers make decisions in your favor based on what they remember, not on what they forget. Optimal repetition can indeed open doors.
Geetesh: Carmen, you have done several keynotes at the Presentation Summit conferences in the past. What is your secret in successfully delivering fresh, new content each time?
Carmen: It is easy to find fresh content. Just pay attention to challenges you have when you’re creating your own presentations or other people’s presentations. Our firm, Rexi Media, uses brain science to create corporate presentations and/or deliver brain science workshops. In that process, I look for frequent questions people ask when they work with me or when they attend our workshops. A recent technique I’ve embedded in every single presentation our firm creates is the repetition of a consistent message. If I were to generalize, regardless of the format (presentation, blog, conversation), I’ve been coaching clients to constantly return to one main, consistent message, regardless of the length of a segment (e.g., speaking for 10 minutes or one hour or one day). But this advice begs the question: how do you repeat without running something into the ground? And that’s where the idea of “optimal repetition” for the keynote came from: people’s fear of looking foolish in front of an audience.
Repetition leads to memory but… does it also lead to annoyance?
See Also: Carmen Simon on Indezine
For many years now, Rick Altman has been hosting the Presentation Summit, a highly popular event that is geared towards users of PowerPoint and other presentation platforms.
Date: October 23 to 26, 2016
Location: Green Valley Ranch, Las Vegas, United States
Twitter Hashtag: Presum16
April 2003 | May 2003 | December 2003 | January 2004 | February 2004 | March 2004 | April 2004 | May 2004 | June 2004 | July 2004 | August 2004 | September 2004 | October 2004 | November 2004 | December 2004 | January 2005 | February 2005 | March 2005 | April 2005 | May 2005 | June 2005 | July 2005 | August 2005 | September 2005 | October 2005 | November 2005 | December 2005 | January 2006 | February 2006 | March 2006 | April 2006 | May 2006 | June 2006 | July 2006 | August 2006 | September 2006 | October 2006 | November 2006 | December 2006 | January 2007 | February 2007 | March 2007 | April 2007 | May 2007 | June 2007 | July 2007 | August 2007 | September 2007 | October 2007 | November 2007 | December 2007 | January 2008 | February 2008 | March 2008 | April 2008 | May 2008 | June 2008 | July 2008 | August 2008 | September 2008 | October 2008 | November 2008 | December 2008 | January 2009 | February 2009 | March 2009 | April 2009 | May 2009 | June 2009 | July 2009 | August 2009 | September 2009 | October 2009 | November 2009 | December 2009 | January 2010 | February 2010 | March 2010 | April 2010 | May 2010 | June 2010 | July 2010 | August 2010 | September 2010 | October 2010 | November 2010 | December 2010 | January 2011 | February 2011 | March 2011 | April 2011 | May 2011 | June 2011 | July 2011 | August 2011 | September 2011 | October 2011 | November 2011 | December 2011 | January 2012 | February 2012 | March 2012 | April 2012 | May 2012 | June 2012 | July 2012 | August 2012 | September 2012 | October 2012 | November 2012 | December 2012 | January 2013 | February 2013 | March 2013 | April 2013 | May 2013 | June 2013 | July 2013 | August 2013 | September 2013 | October 2013 | November 2013 | December 2013 | January 2014 | February 2014 | March 2014 | April 2014 | May 2014 | June 2014 | July 2014 | August 2014 | September 2014 | October 2014 | November 2014 | December 2014 | January 2015 | February 2015 | March 2015 | April 2015 | May 2015 | June 2015 | July 2015 | August 2015 | September 2015 | October 2015 | November 2015 | December 2015 | January 2016 | February 2016 | March 2016 | April 2016 | May 2016 | June 2016 | July 2016 | August 2016 | September 2016 | October 2016 | November 2016 | December 2016 | January 2017 | February 2017 |
Microsoft and the Office logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries.